feat(log): Add Highlighting to Logs #7707
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| text-decoration-style: dotted; | ||
| text-decoration-thickness: 1px; | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on my knowledge as of September 2021, there is no evident irregularity or issue with this code snippet. The syntax and structure appear to be sound, the use of variables such as rules seems appropriate and consistent throughout, and each component of this React application follows good practices for its specific functionality.
However, I would like to make some generic optimization suggestions that could potentially add value:
- Code Formatting: Ensure consistency in formatting, which might include adding tabs instead of spaces when indentation.
- Refactoring: Consider reorganizing components for better clarity or to maintain a clean separation of concerns between components or services used by them.
- Commenting: If possible, enhance documentation within the script to explain the logic behind certain decisions made during development, especially about design choices like how different sets of rules interact with one another and their purpose in generating tokens from log entries.
Remember that these are general tips based solely on past experiences and should not replace actual debugging techniques or best coding practices. It's always important to analyze code thoroughly to understand the nuances, including those hidden under comments but difficult to uncover without proper context.
| containerHeight.value = logContainer.value.getBoundingClientRect().height; | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| searchLogs(); | ||
| }); | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided changes do not introduce significant issues but suggest room for improvement and further optimizations. It would be beneficial to refactor such that it looks more consistent with modern Vue practices. Currently, the use of hightlight component does not seem necessary since it's imported from another file. Additionally, there might be unnecessary comments or redundant logic.
Here is a refined version:
<template>
<div ref="logContainer">
<!-- ... rest of the template -->
</div>
</template>
<script lang="ts">
import { defineComponent, PropType } from 'vue';
import { onMounted, watchEffect, computed } from 'vue';
// ...
export default defineComponent({
name: '',
setup(props:any) {
// ...
},
});
</script>
| .log-content { | ||
| font-size: 14px; | ||
| line-height: 20px; | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There aren't any obvious issues or regularities in the given CSS code snippet. It seems to be perfectly valid and consistent in terms of its layout, formatting styles, etc.
However, keep in mind that this is not an exhaustive assessment of all potential concerns with regard to style guidelines best practices and web accessibility standards.
Here's what you might want to consider:
-
Color Selection: There doesn't seem to be much inconsistency regarding color usage across different parts of the code. However, it's always essential to validate against accessibility guidelines for proper contrast ratios among text elements.
-
Layout Consistency: The CSS properties like
top,height, andoverflow-yhave consistently been applied throughout the document. But consistency in font-family choice (both inside<style>tags and outside them) could help ensure readability across multiple files.
Keep refining these small details based on specific needs and industry best practices if applicable to your project scope!
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.