Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tests: there is not enough coverage #1

Open
ChrisBuchholz opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Tests: there is not enough coverage #1

ChrisBuchholz opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
@ChrisBuchholz
Labels
bug

Comments

@ChrisBuchholz
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@ChrisBuchholz
Copy link
Owner Author

There is not enough even though codecov says there is 100%. See issue #5.

@ChrisBuchholz ChrisBuchholz self-assigned this Jan 17, 2017
tcmal pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 15, 2018
Unit tests for contains. (#3 #1)
5ff4fa8
tcmal pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 15, 2018
Tests for eq & either (#3 #1)
2499966
tcmal pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 15, 2018
Tests for max, min, length & length_is_present (#3 #1)
06cc629
tcmal pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 15, 2018
Fixed & wrote tests for inclusive range functions. (#3 #1)
baba62c 
Inclusive range is now stable so it doesn't need to be an extra feature,
it still is here for backwards compatibility. (#16)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ChrisBuchholz ChrisBuchholz

Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ChrisBuchholz