Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AVNI connector is slow for Arghyam Data #71

Open
siddhant3030 opened this issue Feb 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

AVNI connector is slow for Arghyam Data #71

siddhant3030 opened this issue Feb 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@siddhant3030
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm trying to test AVNI connector for last few days and I noticed that its taking lot of time for such a small dataset. We need to test this with incremental as well. My best guess is its because of the API's but lets look into this.

Screenshot 2024-02-11 at 9 30 49 PM
@fatchat fatchat transferred this issue from DalgoT4D/DDP_backend Feb 11, 2024
@fatchat fatchat added this to Dalgo Feb 11, 2024
@fatchat
Copy link

fatchat commented Feb 12, 2024

2024-02-01 06:50:14 source > Marking stream encounters as RUNNING
2024-02-01 06:57:56 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.b.BufferedStreamConsumer(periodicBufferFlush):220 Periodic buffer flush started
2024-02-01 06:57:56 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):85 Flushing encounters: 1287 records (8 MB)
2024-02-01 06:57:57 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):91 Flushing completed for encounters
2024-02-01 06:57:57 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):85 Flushing subjects: 1204 records (8 MB)
2024-02-01 06:57:58 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):91 Flushing completed for subjects
2024-02-01 07:13:38 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.b.BufferedStreamConsumer(periodicBufferFlush):220 Periodic buffer flush started
2024-02-01 07:13:38 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):85 Flushing encounters: 2507 records (7 MB)
2024-02-01 07:13:38 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):91 Flushing completed for encounters
2024-02-01 07:28:51 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.b.BufferedStreamConsumer(periodicBufferFlush):220 Periodic buffer flush started
2024-02-01 07:28:51 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):85 Flushing encounters: 1889 records (5 MB)
2024-02-01 07:28:51 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):91 Flushing completed for encounters
2024-02-01 07:44:00 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.b.BufferedStreamConsumer(periodicBufferFlush):220 Periodic buffer flush started
2024-02-01 07:44:00 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):85 Flushing encounters: 2214 records (6 MB)
2024-02-01 07:44:00 destination > INFO o.a.s.c.s.h.AbstractSession(requestNewKeysExchange):2271 requestNewKeysExchange(ClientSessionImpl[<user>@/<ip-address>:22]) Initiating key re-exchange
2024-02-01 07:44:01 destination > WARN o.a.s.c.k.StaticServerKeyVerifier(handleAcceptance):59 Server at /<ip-address>:22 presented unverified EC key: SHA256:<....>/<....>/w
2024-02-01 07:44:01 destination > INFO i.a.i.d.r.InMemoryRecordBufferingStrategy(flushAll):91 Flushing completed for encounters
2024-02-01 07:50:54 source > Read 9188 records from encounters stream

@fatchat fatchat moved this to In Progress in Dalgo Feb 12, 2024
@fatchat fatchat self-assigned this Feb 12, 2024
@fatchat fatchat moved this from In Progress to Hold in Dalgo Feb 12, 2024
@avirajsingh7
Copy link

avirajsingh7 commented Feb 15, 2024

Hello @siddhant3030, we can increase the page size here but I am not sure what is max value for that due to small number of records ( there is no mention of max page size on api docs) . Can you try hit and trail to find max page size in postman and change it to that.
It can be 10X faster if max page size is 1000

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Hold
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants