You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This paper describes the way several disciplines organised themselves to set up their disciplinary interoperability framework, commonalities and differences. It comes from a panel discussion in a session of SciDataCon 2016. It will be useful for the 'Research data culture' and 'Making FAIR data real' sections of the report.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for sharing nice paper. I would suggest Use cases such as Agriculture & Innovative Policymaking. It is time to quantify for which sector/discipline , how many datasets should be at least find/discoverable, accessible, and interoperable. I would not include reusable as if the above three conditions are met then certainly, data can be re-used. Am sharing a ppt (paper will follow soon) that quantifies (how many datasets?) are required for making agri-policies. Let us focus on how data can help improve policy decisions, too i.e. practicality of consuming data for the public good. RG Link to the mentioned stuff is: Information Sharing: The Missing Ingredient in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy of Pakistan –Agriculture Perspective
Building a Disciplinary, World‐Wide Data Infrastructure, by Francoise Genova et al https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-016
This paper describes the way several disciplines organised themselves to set up their disciplinary interoperability framework, commonalities and differences. It comes from a panel discussion in a session of SciDataCon 2016. It will be useful for the 'Research data culture' and 'Making FAIR data real' sections of the report.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: