Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Separate lists for 'active' vs. 'inactive' team members when marking who is present #80

Open
Ardaglash opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Separate lists for 'active' vs. 'inactive' team members when marking who is present #80

Ardaglash opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
Complexity - 2 Medium Issue is estimated to require a moderate amount of code changes, affecting multiple files. enhancement New feature or request. Importance - 2 Moderate An issue that makes the app more difficult to use.

Comments

@Ardaglash
Copy link
Collaborator

On the “set who is present” page, shift ‘inactive’ members to a 2nd list on the page (so it’s easier to update active members)
@Ardaglash Ardaglash added the enhancement New feature or request. label Apr 27, 2022
@JL102
Copy link
Collaborator

JL102 commented Feb 17, 2024

How do we identify whether a member is "active" or "inactive"?

@JL102 JL102 added Complexity - 2 Medium Issue is estimated to require a moderate amount of code changes, affecting multiple files. Importance - 2 Moderate An issue that makes the app more difficult to use. labels Mar 15, 2024
@JL102
Copy link
Collaborator

JL102 commented Mar 15, 2024

Add an 'inactive' flag to users so they don't appear in the set who is present page?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Complexity - 2 Medium Issue is estimated to require a moderate amount of code changes, affecting multiple files. enhancement New feature or request. Importance - 2 Moderate An issue that makes the app more difficult to use.
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@JL102 @Ardaglash