You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 28, 2022. It is now read-only.
The idea here being that if we can show that two indirect edges have the same meta-data template, then their look-up lists can be merged. Combine this with conversion of a look-up list into a look-up table of lists, and there is something to this :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The major challenge here would likely be matching up the out-edge templates. Ultimately, I think the right way forward is to find some canonical way to deal with all indirect edges. This might involve making the in- and out-edges more strict.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The idea here being that if we can show that two indirect edges have the same meta-data template, then their look-up lists can be merged. Combine this with conversion of a look-up list into a look-up table of lists, and there is something to this :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: