You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2021. It is now read-only.
We are using for inchi metadata, which is controlling the namespace for InChI.
However the edit interface on the repository allows uncontrolled key/value pairs, and presumably the metadata sent to DataCite has no scheme URI specified.
Should a third field be added to the edit interface to add a scheme IRI if one is desired?
But how should the subjectscheme name and URI be controlled?
Should eg the values for be controlled by Symplectic, in the same way that grant values are controlled?
I think this has to be the next top priority development for the repository.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
We are using for inchi metadata, which is controlling the namespace for InChI.
However the edit interface on the repository allows uncontrolled key/value pairs, and presumably the metadata sent to DataCite has no scheme URI specified.
Should a third field be added to the edit interface to add a scheme IRI if one is desired?
But how should the subjectscheme name and URI be controlled?
Should eg the values for be controlled by Symplectic, in the same way that grant values are controlled?
I think this has to be the next top priority development for the repository.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: