-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why not make it a git repo? #402
Comments
TL;DR: to decrease maintenance burden. Trust issues are from the copier side. To execute commands in the generated repo, you have to use For new packages, we could run git commands from the Julia side to create the repo, but I've been trying to keep it light (maintenance). From your experience, does it involves many corner cases? For existing packages, the user has to look at the result and decide what to add/restore, so no automatic commands. Thanks for the question and let me know what you think of the reasoning. |
I guess my question then becomes why does this involve more trust for I haven't found that git has caused much maintainance burden |
When you run I'm still on the fence, but we can split into two issues:
I'm not picking this up right now, but for someone wanting to pick up 1, I think the following is needed:
|
Description
The docs say:
What are these trust issues? (I am already running arbitrary code that is in this package after all)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: