Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[GeoMechanicsApplication] Extend the Check member function of the TransientPwLineElement #13000

Open
rfaasse opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

[GeoMechanicsApplication] Extend the Check member function of the TransientPwLineElement #13000

rfaasse opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
GeoMechanics Issues related to the GeoMechanicsApplication Refactor When code is moved or rewrote keeping the same behavior

Comments

@rfaasse
Copy link
Contributor

rfaasse commented Jan 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

As a developer, I want to make sure the TransientPwLineElement performs the expected checks, also for 2D/3D.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The line element carries out the same checks as currently for 1D elements
  • For 2D/3D The line element performs the correct checks, see TransientPwElement for reference.
@rfaasse rfaasse converted this from a draft issue Jan 10, 2025
@rfaasse rfaasse added Refactor When code is moved or rewrote keeping the same behavior GeoMechanics Issues related to the GeoMechanicsApplication labels Jan 10, 2025
@indigocoral
Copy link
Contributor

indigocoral commented Jan 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Refinement 13/01/2025

Checks that are for the constitutive law should remain there. Here we check the kind of constitutive law and variables (water pressure, DT_water_pressure, volume_acceleration, DOFs, etc).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
GeoMechanics Issues related to the GeoMechanicsApplication Refactor When code is moved or rewrote keeping the same behavior
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rfaasse @indigocoral