Connect transcriptions of ROI to instances of oa:TextualBody

[arnikz]

Currently, oa:Annotation instance links directly to oa:TextualBody and dwc:Taxon instances:

SFB-Annotator/data/rdf/example_1_1.ttl

Lines 2 to 6 in 5b83310

	<http://makingsense.liacs.nl/rdf/nc/annotation/a5b4aaa3-42b4-4046-a05b-a506e01aaf2f>
	a <http://www.w3.org/ns/oa#Annotation>;
	<http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator> <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-4803>;
	<http://purl.org/dc/terms/date> "2017-09-21";
	<http://www.w3.org/ns/oa#hasBody> <http://makingsense.liacs.nl/rdf/nc/taxon1>, _:node1ec3i5nr1x861 .

@lisestork: Should we link the two instances with rdf:value predicate [1]?

[lisestork]

See also #28 (comment). I believe the dwc:Taxon instance should be directly connected to the oa:Annotation instance via the oa:hasBody property, and the "motivation": "classification".

@arnikz I agree that for the transcription of the region of interest, the transcription should indeed be attached to a blank node using the predicate rdf:value as in example 15

[arnikz]

I think, using oa:TextualBody just for this

SFB-Annotator/data/rdf/example_1_1.ttl

Lines 8 to 10 in 5b83310

	_:node1ec3i5nr1x861 a <http://www.w3.org/ns/oa#TextualBody>;
	<http://purl.org/dc/terms/format> "text/plain";
	<http://purl.org/dc/terms/language> "la" .

without this

SFB-Annotator/data/rdf/example_1_1.ttl

Line 34 in 5b83310

<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label> "Pteropus minimus"@la .

is not that useful.

[lisestork]

Yes, I agree. In that case it is not so useful.

I think it would be good to have two bodies if a piece of text is both classified and transcribed, as we can record the two different purposes (although there is no 'transcribing' motivation tag, just 'describing'). Maybe it should be an option in the interface, so that the classification or the transcription can also be recorded separately.

textualbody: example 5 (transcribing/describing)
class from nhc: example 44 (classifying)