Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Episode 03 3.3 focus on Mae Jemison rather than book? #17

Closed
eslao opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Episode 03 3.3 focus on Mae Jemison rather than book? #17

eslao opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
needs_discussion needs discussion

Comments

@eslao
Copy link

eslao commented May 31, 2019

While looking at adapting the current example (Feynman and one of his books) to use Mae Jemison and one her books, I'm wondering whether it might make more sense to add detailed steps for describing the first item (Mae Jemison) rather than the second one (her book), for two reasons:

  1. It seems weird to not add an instance and at least one profession based on Jemison's Wikipedia entry, which would also be easy to add as a reference. (Her memoir doesn't have a Wikipedia entry and describing it, with references, would require the learner to look for external sources, which doesn't seem to be the emphasis of this exercise.)
  2. Describing the book would require delving into more complex modeling (is it an instance of "book" or "written work" or "version, edition, or translation"?
    See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Books
@konrad konrad added the needs_discussion needs discussion label Jul 14, 2020
@konrad konrad changed the title Lesson 03 3.3 focus on Mae Jemison rather than book? Episode 03 3.3 focus on Mae Jemison rather than book? Jul 14, 2020
@RabeaMue
Copy link
Collaborator

RabeaMue commented Mar 5, 2022

changed the example to Mae Jemison instead oh Feymans book

@RabeaMue RabeaMue closed this as completed Mar 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs_discussion needs discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants