Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dtiestim does not recognize B0s in a DWI #49

Open
markwfoster opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

dtiestim does not recognize B0s in a DWI #49

markwfoster opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@markwfoster
Copy link

For diffusion-weighted-imaging protocols that collect DWIs with opposite phase-encoding directions (e.g. AP/PA), B0 volumes may have b-values that are slightly greater than 0 (e.g. b-value = 5 ). It appears that dtiestim is not able to recognize these volumes as B0s (since their b-values are not equal to 0), and it defaults to using the first gradient in the DWI as the B0 it users for tensor estimation and other calculations. Assuming that the first gradient in a DWI is a B0 may be incorrect since quality-control protocols could have excluded the first gradient. (The second gradient, which may also be a B0, could also have been excluded.) This issue also affects IDWI calculation and baseline averaging. It would be great if a new version of dtiestim had a flag that allowed the user to specify a threshold under which it would consider a gradient to be a B0.

@jcfr
Copy link
Contributor

jcfr commented Jul 15, 2020

Thanks for the report 🙏

To help the broader community to know about this issue and provide guidance, I suggest you summarize it on the slicer forum: https://discourse.slicer.org/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants