You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you very much for this amazing tool! we very much enjoy utilize it. I have a question regarding the transition from TN to ITN, or vice versa, once one of them has been implemented.
In the WFST tutorial, it was mentioned that, for constructing a TN system, you can generally achieve this by inverting your existing graphs (consider using pynini.invert) and making output changes to resolve indeterminacy (choosing a canonical output for each class).
While I can see the 'ru' language ITN implementation achieved broadly using the invert() function on the TN WFST, it appears that 'fr' language has distinct implementations for both TN and ITN.
I'm a bit puzzled about why some languages still support only one of the pair (TN/ITN) if the transition is relatively straightforward using the "invert" function. I tried to find answers online but was unsuccessful. Any guidance you could provide on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Dear Team,
Thank you very much for this amazing tool! we very much enjoy utilize it. I have a question regarding the transition from TN to ITN, or vice versa, once one of them has been implemented.
In the WFST tutorial, it was mentioned that, for constructing a TN system, you can generally achieve this by inverting your existing graphs (consider using pynini.invert) and making output changes to resolve indeterminacy (choosing a canonical output for each class).
While I can see the 'ru' language ITN implementation achieved broadly using the invert() function on the TN WFST, it appears that 'fr' language has distinct implementations for both TN and ITN.
I'm a bit puzzled about why some languages still support only one of the pair (TN/ITN) if the transition is relatively straightforward using the "invert" function. I tried to find answers online but was unsuccessful. Any guidance you could provide on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you sincerely.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions