Do you maintain the whole codebase? #2268
-
I ran across this conversation in issues, where it's said that the MysqlQueueDao is not used or maintained. Is this actually true? I assumed that you all maintain any code that is merged from contributor PRs. I'm asking because my group has created a Sql server module and I notice there is a pr out there doing essentially the same thing. If that pr is merged am I to assume it may not adhere to standards like file structure and dependency management? Also, which persistence layers were created and are maintained by the Netflix dev teams? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
Short answer is, we try to. Long answer is, there is no clear demarcation between community contributions and core supported modules. Before a PR is merged, we ensure that file structure and coding standards are maintained. But we won't know the intricacies of the contribution to enough to fully support it. We typically tag the original authors of the module if there are any support issues in the contributed modules.
cassandra-persistence, es*-persistence, redis-persistence are supported by us. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For what it's worth @EwilsonS , we have used Mysql for a few years now and has worked fine for us. I also know others have used Postgres as well. But I do not think the Netflix team maintains those libs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Short answer is, we try to. Long answer is, there is no clear demarcation between community contributions and core supported modules. Before a PR is merged, we ensure that file structure and coding standards are maintained. But we won't know the intricacies of the contribution to enough to fully support it. We typically tag the original authors of the module if there are any support issues in the contributed modules.
cassandra-persistence, es*-persistence, redis-persistence are supported by us.