Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Include FORCes experiments as compsets #132

Closed
gold2718 opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Include FORCes experiments as compsets #132

gold2718 opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@gold2718
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
NorESM2.3

Comments

@gold2718
Copy link

gold2718 commented Feb 1, 2024 •
edited
Loading

What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?

Bring in the FORCeS experiment
In addition to the coupled compsets (see NorESMhub/NorESM#465), implement these AMIP compsets:

  • NF1850FORCeS: FORCeS tunings
  • NFHISTFORCeS: FORCeS tunings
  • NF1850norbcForces: FORCeS tunings
  • NFHISTnorbc_aer2014Forces: FORCeS tunings
  • NF1850: KeyClim 1850 Cloud2
  • NFHIST: KeyClim 1850 Cloud2

Details of code differences are in #108

Will this change (regression test) answers?

Yes

Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?

Yes
@gold2718 gold2718 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 1, 2024
@gold2718 gold2718 added this to the NorESM2.3 milestone Feb 1, 2024
@gold2718 gold2718 self-assigned this Feb 1, 2024
@gold2718 gold2718 changed the title Include FORCes experiment as a compset Include FORCes experiments as compsets Apr 11, 2024
@gold2718 gold2718 mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2024
Open
@gold2718 gold2718 moved this from Todo to In Progress in NorESM Development Apr 30, 2024
@oyvindseland
Copy link

Re the discussion we have had on this topic in CAM-core meeting I think it is enough to have a complete set of parameterisations from Forces defined by default or namelist, which I do think we will have in NorESM2.3.1. I do not think it is necessary to create explicit compsets since the results will be different than Forces anyway. (Bug fixes and BLOM modifcations) I suggest to close the issue.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in NorESM Development Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@gold2718 gold2718

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
NorESM Development
Status: Done
Milestone
NorESM2.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gold2718 @oyvindseland