{agency} coordination with OSMPH

[govvin]

I'm quoting the original text from group email conversation, to document the discussion of the idea, in principle. The original text is redacted: {agency} is a government agency, and employer of the {proponent}, and {contractor} is party who is interested in engaging members of the the OSMPH community.

"Piggy-backing" replaced with collaborating, as suggested by @maning in the email convo.

Nothing is final as of yet. Let's consider this as a rough idea and unofficial. I'm approaching by the way as an OSMPH contributor who is trying to link the benefits if {agency} and OSMPH would work together in a closer partnership. But by principle, if there is an {contractor} who would be initiating (in this case snipped) and {agency} will be piggy-backing collaborating, we would need to coordinate with that {contractor} to see how we can come about it. Thus, the need for {proponent} to be informed to check whatever options we can have. (Options, meaning - how the {contractor}, OSMPH and {agency} can mutually benefit.)