Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Merge taxonomies #146

Open
ospitia opened this issue Aug 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Merge taxonomies #146

ospitia opened this issue Aug 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@AyahSoufan @ospitia
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ospitia
Copy link
Contributor

ospitia commented Aug 8, 2022

No description provided.

@ospitia ospitia added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 8, 2022
@ospitia
Copy link
Contributor Author

ospitia commented Aug 8, 2022

we have different options:

  • instantiate all taxonomies and search simultaneously for parents and children of a shared initial node (query)
  • leave the concept search as it is and merge the different related concepts from the different taxonomy instances

the advantage of the second is that we could have still the taxonomies separately, and an additional one called merged, the first option could be the same but it slows down the concept search because it's just adding more operations (but could be the best option in case we want to use only one taxonomy)

@ospitia
Copy link
Contributor Author

ospitia commented Aug 9, 2022

merging concepts from different taxonomies could result in redundant concepts. We could use those redundancies to score the concepts and prioritize for displaying less crowded maps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@AyahSoufan AyahSoufan

@ospitia ospitia

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@AyahSoufan @ospitia