Replies: 1 comment
-
cc: @huybery |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi there, the technical report for Qwen2.5-Coder indicates that the repo-level FIM format follows:
However, the technical report also references Lozhkov, et al (2024) which follows a slightly different format:
Specifically, Lozhkov sets the FIM prefix token before the filepath to be completed, whereas the technical report seems to suggest Qwen2.5 was trained with the token after. I want to confirm that this is correct, that the repo-level FIM indeed follows a slightly different format?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions