Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interfaces to abstract subnets may not be needed #167

Open
mike1813 opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Interfaces to abstract subnets may not be needed #167

mike1813 opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mike1813
Copy link
Member

mike1813 commented Aug 2, 2024

Pattern ILSA+c adds a relationship from a host to logical subnet interface to any abstract subnet for which the logical subnet provides part of the implementation.

This means a host connected to (say) a cellular access network would have an interface to the access network but this interface would also be related to the cellular network.

In most other places, we assume the host is not really connected to the abstract network, and therefore no interface should need to exist between the host and the abstract network. So it is unclear why pattern ILSA+c would be needed. This should be investigated, and ideally this pattern should be removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant