Support "readOnly"

[omid]

Hello,

Do we support "readOnly"?
If yes, I couldn't figure it out, could you please lead me to a way to handle it?
If no, then it's a feature request :)

[Stranger6667]

Hi! Do you mean Open API's readOnly?

[Stranger6667]

Please, disregard my last comment.
Those annotations are not supported.

[Stranger6667]

What would be the expected behavior then? from the validation point of view

[omid]

Just to reference for the futures, I meant this: https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.4

IMHO:

1. The simplest expected behavior could be to return some errors.
2. The more advanced is, to accept a default (or previous) list of values to pick from.

[omid]

Yep, the second one can be not related to validation, it's more sanitization.
It's similar to replace the "default" values in the lack of field.