You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This seems to be a reoccurrence of #1354 presumably related to changes on GitHub’s end. In the screenshot provided, notice that the highlighted selection only covers the lines partially, however, this selection includes the full lines.
Digging around with Inspect Element, while #read-only-cursor-text-area is still a valid selector for this element on such a page, it seems that the custom styles are being overwritten:
a rule for the selector .react-blob-print-hide overrides the custom font-family value
an in-line/element.style rule is overriding the custom font-size value
This appears to be resolved locally when adding .react-blob-print-hide to the list of selectors in the stylesheet:
Thank you for digging in! This was driving me crazy and I couldn't figure out what selectors I needed to make it work properly, but with your changes my selections look seamless + natural again. 🙏 much appreciated
On a sidenote, I don't think I will maintain this usercss anymore, so if you guys want to fork it, feel free to and I will link to that and remove it from this repo.
This seems to be a reoccurrence of #1354 presumably related to changes on GitHub’s end. In the screenshot provided, notice that the highlighted selection only covers the lines partially, however, this selection includes the full lines.
Digging around with Inspect Element, while
#read-only-cursor-text-area
is still a valid selector for this element on such a page, it seems that the custom styles are being overwritten:.react-blob-print-hide
overrides the custom font-family valueThis appears to be resolved locally when adding
.react-blob-print-hide
to the list of selectors in the stylesheet:Edit: Include the required addition of
!important
to thefont-family
andfont-size
values.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: