Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

关于dpm-solver的问题 #133

Open
ipwjincheng opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

关于dpm-solver的问题 #133

ipwjincheng opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@ipwjincheng
Copy link

作者你好,我在训练ISIC数据集的时候,训练了2w7个step,使用ddim sample可以得到较好的结果,但是当我使用dpm-solver之后效果会变得很差,请问这是什么原因呢?
dpm-solver的配置是50个step。
期待您的回复

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


Title: Questions about dpm-solver

Hello author, when I trained the ISIC data set, I trained 2w7 steps. I can get better results using ddim sample, but when I use dpm-solver, the effect becomes very poor. What is the reason for this? ?
The configuration of dpm-solver is 50 steps.
Looking forward to your reply

@chenglr3
Copy link

@ipwjincheng 你用的是ISIC2016还是ISIC2018,数据量有多大,我训练的时候loss收敛的很快,但是loss_cal下不去,最终使用dpm-solver推理效果还可以,但是使用ddpm推理很差

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


@ipwjincheng Are you using ISIC2016 or ISIC2018? How big is the amount of data? When I trained, the loss converged quickly, but the loss_cal could not go down. In the end, the inference effect using dpm-solver was okay, but the inference using ddpm was very poor.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants