You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm noticing that users are adopting increasing amounts of orchestration as they build and deploy and use Abaco. A limitation of the current system is that one must poll for completion of a given task (deploy, update, execute, scale up, delete, etc). The obvious exception is when one is using the upcoming synchronous endpoint, but that doesn't cover the other use cases anyway. Further validation of the possible need for this is that where we have implemented callback support in the client-side SDK, it has been a valuable addition to the orchestration toolkit. I propose at least adding at least a simple post-action callback mechanism to Abaco. We can discuss the implementation details below, but I wanted to get this pinned to the board for consideration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree completely, let's hammer out some initial use cases. I've been doing some research on event systems in support of Tapis v3 any way. I think Abaco can serve as an early adopter and provide use cases, requirements, and even implement a prototype, depending on our time table and delivery schedule.
I'm noticing that users are adopting increasing amounts of orchestration as they build and deploy and use Abaco. A limitation of the current system is that one must poll for completion of a given task (deploy, update, execute, scale up, delete, etc). The obvious exception is when one is using the upcoming synchronous endpoint, but that doesn't cover the other use cases anyway. Further validation of the possible need for this is that where we have implemented callback support in the client-side SDK, it has been a valuable addition to the orchestration toolkit. I propose at least adding at least a simple post-action callback mechanism to Abaco. We can discuss the implementation details below, but I wanted to get this pinned to the board for consideration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: