-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TraCeR on 10X cellranegr vdj output filtered_contig.fasta demultiplexed files #95
Comments
Yes, I think that should enable you to get the files through TraCeR (although I've not tried it). Is there a reason you want to do that rather than using the Cell Ranger annotations? |
Thank you! I first wanted to do this for BraCeR because I find BraCeR output data more comprehensive (for example, cellranger vdj doesn't output Ig isotype distribution or I can't find it) so I assumed the same would apply to TraCeR vs cellranger vdj, but I guess here there should be no major difference... or is there any TraCeR-specific output? |
I'm not sure it's going to be worth it. The main addition that tracer has is the clonotype graphs but those become too resource-intensive to draw once you get beyond a few hundred cells so I don't think you'll gain much.
All the best,
Mike
… On 15 Oct 2019, at 16:22, Anna Arutyunyan ***@***.***> wrote:
Thank you!
I first wanted to do this for BraCeR because I find BraCeR output data more comprehensive (for example, cellranger vdj doesn't output IG isotype distribution or I can't find it) so I assumed the same would apply to TraCeR vs cellranger vdj, but I guess here there should be no major difference... or is there any TraCeR-specific output?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#95?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIXBBUVTMLIYNSU6B5ALZLQOXN2FA5CNFSM4JA5426KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEBJFOGI#issuecomment-542267161>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIXBBWMTD7QKBVBHLMIUT3QOXN2FANCNFSM4JA5426A>.
|
Thanks a lot! This helps. Sincerely, |
Hi, Coming back to the previous discussion, do you know if cellranger vdj reports CDR3 region sequences like TraCeR and BraCeR do? Thank you. Sincerely, |
Hi Anna,
Yes, the CDR3 sequences are in the Cell Ranger annotation file outputs (https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-vdj/software/pipelines/latest/output/annotation).
Note that these are the genuine CDR3 sequences. Tracer reports the ‘junction’ sequences as reported by IgBlast. These are _not_ the canonical CDR3s. So, Cell Ranger’s output is probably more useful.
Cheers,
Mike
… On 20 Oct 2019, at 13:52, Anna Arutyunyan ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
Coming back to the previous discussion, do you know if cellranger vdj reports CDR3 region sequences like TraCeR and BraCeR do?
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Anna Arutyunyan
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Thank you very much Mike! Sincerely, |
Hi, Sincerely, |
Hi,
Similar to this issue Teichlab/bracer#21 (comment) in BraCeR, can one run TraCeR on the per-cell fasta files demultiplexed from filtered_contig.fasta output of cellranger vdj?
If yes, then with what adjustments?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: