You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Default subroutines output the discontinuous profile at $H$ and other height (in the figure below, it was ~40 m agl).
Issue 1: Absence of $\psi_m$ calculation at height $H$
In suews_phys_rslprof, $\hat{\psi_m}$ is calculated at heights $> H$ but not at the exact height $H$.
This absence affects the profile below $H$ because the exponential layer refers to $U_H$ for the in-canopy profile.
Proposed Change: Update the code to include $H$ as the height where $\hat{\psi_m}$ is calculated.
Issue 2: Stability criteria in suews_phys_atmmoiststab
The current implementation forces stability to neutral when $\left| \frac{z-d}{L_0} \right| < 0.01$.
This criterion is relatively large for vertically resolved layers and causes abrupt shifts in $\psi_m$ to 0 within the middle of the layer because $\left| \frac{z-d}{L_0} \right|$ becomes small enough at some near-surface levels.
Proposed Change: Narrow the criteria to $\left| \frac{z-d}{L_0} \right| < 1 \times 10^{-4}$ to reduce neutrality in the stability function.
Note: This change may affect processes elsewhere in the model.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this is issue is reported by @nakaoipeirc
Default subroutines output the discontinuous profile at$H$ and other height (in the figure below, it was ~40 m agl).
Issue 1: Absence of$\psi_m$ calculation at height $H$
suews_phys_rslprof
,Issue 2: Stability criteria in
suews_phys_atmmoiststab
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: