You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thank you for introducing this method and the implementation! I had a quick question regarding the table in your paper with TAP-Vid metrics for different baseline models (page 5, Table 1). Using the official SMURF implementation and provided checkpoint, I am unable to reproduce the numbers that were reported here. Here is a side-by-side comparison
Metrics
Paper
My code
AJ
29.8
25.7
AD
27.4
32.4
Avg pts
42.7
37.3
I am resizing all DAVIS frames (and labels) to (256, 256) when computing the metric. I am also using the sintel-smurf checkpoint. It would be immensely helpful if you could point me to the specific configurations or code that you used to generate the numbers reported in the paper. I found the results to be quite interesting, especially because I could not find any other papers evaluating smurf on Tap-Vid DAVIS, and would love to look into this further. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thank you for introducing this method and the implementation! I had a quick question regarding the table in your paper with TAP-Vid metrics for different baseline models (page 5, Table 1). Using the official SMURF implementation and provided checkpoint, I am unable to reproduce the numbers that were reported here. Here is a side-by-side comparison
I am resizing all DAVIS frames (and labels) to (256, 256) when computing the metric. I am also using the sintel-smurf checkpoint. It would be immensely helpful if you could point me to the specific configurations or code that you used to generate the numbers reported in the paper. I found the results to be quite interesting, especially because I could not find any other papers evaluating smurf on Tap-Vid DAVIS, and would love to look into this further. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: