Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hybrid BYOS/TKV Protocol Proposal #77

Open
dmdabbs opened this issue Jul 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Hybrid BYOS/TKV Protocol Proposal #77

dmdabbs opened this issue Jul 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@dmdabbs
Copy link

dmdabbs commented Jul 15, 2024

I was unable to attend the 3 July call and am catching up from the meeting notes posted today.

  • Hybrid protocol – modify v2 protocol so that a single request can go to both BYOS and TKV servers. This is meant to be a temporary measure, and when the enforcement starts only TKV mode will be supported. The benefits of the hybrid protocol are:
    • enables piecemeal migration. AdTechs can migrate pieces of their logic and asses the cost/latency and other parameters before fully committing
    • allows keeping parts of the logic that are not currently supported by TKV in BYOS, while moving the rest to TKV.
  • Encrypted + plain text payload.
  • Encrypted visible only on tee-kv
  • Current byos acts as orchestration + lookup, can see plaintext only

Is there a doc that proposes how a buyer would opt into the new behavior, &c.?

Itay: Value 2: Enables extra signals on the buyer side (page url and couple of other things).

Yes, full page url has been discussed. What other things are under consideration?

@lx3-g
Copy link
Collaborator

lx3-g commented Jul 16, 2024

Hello David,

Your questions above should be covered once we publish public explainers.

Thank you,
Alexander

@dmdabbs
Copy link
Author

dmdabbs commented Jul 16, 2024

Thank you. Looking forward to it. 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants