You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. In FEDER, there is a loss about the edge ( loss_edge = dice_loss(preds[6], edges)*0.125 + dice_loss(preds[7], edges)*0.25 + dice_loss(preds[8], edges)*0.5 ). However, not all datasets contain data about edge information (for example, 'CAMO' ), so I had to remove this loss about edge information, but the experimental results are much different from the results in your article. May I ask how you dealt with this in your experiments?
Sincerely,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, we directly use the results reported in the FEDER paper without reproducing their code. Unfortunately, the authors of FEDER also didn't answer the question about how to obtain the edges (see here). You may try to use cv2.findContours to generate edges from the GT masks.
Hi. In FEDER, there is a loss about the edge ( loss_edge = dice_loss(preds[6], edges)*0.125 + dice_loss(preds[7], edges)*0.25 + dice_loss(preds[8], edges)*0.5 ). However, not all datasets contain data about edge information (for example, 'CAMO' ), so I had to remove this loss about edge information, but the experimental results are much different from the results in your article. May I ask how you dealt with this in your experiments?
Sincerely,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: