Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Need InteractionPeaksBiggest with pax twostepgap clustering #70

Closed
pdeperio opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Need InteractionPeaksBiggest with pax twostepgap clustering #70

pdeperio opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
@JosephJHowlett

Comments

@pdeperio
Copy link
Contributor

If the new pax TwoStepGap clustering is merged (XENON1T/pax#596) as is, will need to reinstate the InteractionPeaksBiggest cut in sciencrun1.py (to reject e.g. Figure 8b in this note).
JosephJHowlett added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2017
@JosephJHowlett
InteractionPeaksBiggest
a39a4a2 
Adding InteractionPeaksBiggest to sciencerun1 lichen. Closes #70.
@JosephJHowlett JosephJHowlett mentioned this issue Jul 27, 2017
Merged
@feigaodm
Copy link
Member

Also needed for accidental coincidence background analysis. Otherwise there will be mis-modelled background in Rn220 calibration data

pdeperio pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 6, 2017
@JosephJHowlett @pdeperio
InteractionPeaksBiggest (#71)
1363b59 
* InteractionPeaksBiggest

Adding InteractionPeaksBiggest to sciencerun1 lichen. Closes #70.

* Update sciencerun1.py

* Update sciencerun1.py

* shouldn't have taken 3 commits...

* make that 4
@tunnell tunnell mentioned this issue Aug 8, 2017
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@JosephJHowlett JosephJHowlett

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@pdeperio @JosephJHowlett @feigaodm