Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When/How to add the pkg to RWeekly #174

Closed
BatoolMM opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 4 comments
Closed

When/How to add the pkg to RWeekly #174

BatoolMM opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Dissemination question Further information is requested

Comments

@BatoolMM
Copy link
Member

BatoolMM commented Jan 6, 2025

I am in charge of curating R weekly of this week. It's basically a weekly newsletter and podcast around everything new in R. We have a section around new and updated R packages. I would like to reference the new version of mapmetadata but I am expecting that we will need to reference a new release with the name changed, is that correct @RayStick? I am just double-checking.

@BatoolMM BatoolMM added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 6, 2025
@BatoolMM BatoolMM self-assigned this Jan 6, 2025
@BatoolMM BatoolMM added enhancement Feature improvement or addition Dissemination and removed bug Something isn't working enhancement Feature improvement or addition labels Jan 6, 2025
@RayStick
Copy link
Member

RayStick commented Jan 6, 2025

Thanks Batool. Before promoting it, I would like to complete this issue: #171
I am working on it this morning, alongside emails and admin. Hopefully it will not take me long to compete! After that, I will ping the rOpenSci thread to get re-activate the review process. Do you think it is best to promote the package after the rOpenSci review process is complete? Or 'under review' is fine?

@RayStick RayStick added the question Further information is requested label Jan 6, 2025
@BatoolMM
Copy link
Member Author

BatoolMM commented Jan 6, 2025

Both are fine - I think 2 levels of promotion (at different time points) are useful, so yes before rOpenSci review process is complete if you are comfortable - let's chat about it in the catch-up tomorrow.

@RayStick
Copy link
Member

RayStick commented Jan 6, 2025

Sounds good, thanks!

@BatoolMM
Copy link
Member Author

A quick mention to the package is added to this week's issue of RWeekly - https://rweekly.org/draft. So, I will close this issue - feel free to re-open it if needed!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dissemination question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants