You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am in charge of curating R weekly of this week. It's basically a weekly newsletter and podcast around everything new in R. We have a section around new and updated R packages. I would like to reference the new version of mapmetadata but I am expecting that we will need to reference a new release with the name changed, is that correct @RayStick? I am just double-checking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks Batool. Before promoting it, I would like to complete this issue: #171
I am working on it this morning, alongside emails and admin. Hopefully it will not take me long to compete! After that, I will ping the rOpenSci thread to get re-activate the review process. Do you think it is best to promote the package after the rOpenSci review process is complete? Or 'under review' is fine?
Both are fine - I think 2 levels of promotion (at different time points) are useful, so yes before rOpenSci review process is complete if you are comfortable - let's chat about it in the catch-up tomorrow.
A quick mention to the package is added to this week's issue of RWeekly - https://rweekly.org/draft. So, I will close this issue - feel free to re-open it if needed!
I am in charge of curating R weekly of this week. It's basically a weekly newsletter and podcast around everything new in R. We have a section around new and updated R packages. I would like to reference the new version of mapmetadata but I am expecting that we will need to reference a new release with the name changed, is that correct @RayStick? I am just double-checking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: