You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The value of the field mask parameter must be a google.protobuf.FieldMask.
This wording might suggest that the value should be in the proto3 JSON representation of a google.protobuf.FieldMask, which I suspect not be the intended interpretation. Given that examples in the AIP include using this parameter as an HTTP query parameter, an HTTP header, and a gRPC metadata entry, it appears that the more prevalent practice is a comma-separated list of paths for specifying field masks.
If my understanding is indeed correct, it might be clearer to revise the statement in AIP-157 to reflect this common usage, potentially rewording it as:
The value of the field mask parameter must be a comma-separated list of paths.
Thank you for considering this adjustment for clarity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In AIP-157, it is stated:
This wording might suggest that the value should be in the proto3 JSON representation of a
google.protobuf.FieldMask
, which I suspect not be the intended interpretation. Given that examples in the AIP include using this parameter as an HTTP query parameter, an HTTP header, and a gRPC metadata entry, it appears that the more prevalent practice is a comma-separated list of paths for specifying field masks.If my understanding is indeed correct, it might be clearer to revise the statement in AIP-157 to reflect this common usage, potentially rewording it as:
Thank you for considering this adjustment for clarity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: