-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@defer / @stream support #5893
Comments
Hi @hwillson! I've been watching for |
The current architecture of how Apollo Server's core logic relates to the web frameworks it can be embedded in makes it challenging to add features such as |
Hi @glasser! Thanks for your response and transparency here. Your hard work on this project is greatly appreciated. However, this response troubles me. I've been waiting for this functionality for a long time. The last time we heard updates from the Apollo team, the response was almost exactly the same, except referring to Apollo 3.0. The message was, "this will be much easier to implement once we have 3.0 released. We'll likely implement in a follow-up minor release after we finish the 3.0 release". Is this actually something that's going to land in 4.0? Or are we going to hear the same story, except with 5.0? EDIT: Here is an old 3.0 roadmap indicating plans to add I'm not referencing these comments and notes to pile on or criticize. I'm just afraid that if work on these directives is not prioritized, that they will never make it into Apollo. These types of functionality can absolutely elevate GraphQL to another level. I love Apollo Server, Apollo Client, and Apollo Studio - but if another service offers support for I want the Apollo team to recognize how important this functionality is for our community. It needs to be prioritized. EDIT4: I also understand that this is a large technical undertaking. Please know that there are community members that would be happy to help - through direct contributions, discussions around API/configuration, and testing POC or RC branches. |
We basically split 3.0 into two pieces, which will be 3.0 and 4.0. Putting off everything that will come in 4.0 would have meant we didn't ship the original improvements of 3.0 last year. The 4.0 roadmap is similar to 3.0; 3.0 ended up being mostly focused on removing integrations with unmaintained projects and enabling folks to use the latest versions of dependencies rather than the full HTTP level rearchitecture we'd originally intended. The comment you found from me last year said that the |
Ah - thank you for clarifying. I did not know that the 3.0 release was split into two. That does make more sense.
Ah my apologies - I thought I had read that |
Now being tracked in #6671. |
This is the main feature request tracking issue for adding
@defer
/@stream
support to Apollo Server. More details will be broken out shortly.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: