Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimized LocalHybridIndex and SparseEmbedding usage #515

Open
jamescalam opened this issue Jan 19, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Optimized LocalHybridIndex and SparseEmbedding usage #515

jamescalam opened this issue Jan 19, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Enhancement to existing features

Comments

@jamescalam
Copy link
Member

We started on optimization (mostly through vectorization) of the hybrid operations throughout the library, ie using internal numpy vectors for storing sparse vectors inside the SparseEmbedding objects, more numpy in LocalHybridIndex, etc — but there are likely still places where we may be unecessarily moving from numpy to python and back again, or not fully utilizing numpy — could we work on these and get everything better optimized for hybrid?

@jamescalam jamescalam added the enhancement Enhancement to existing features label Jan 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement to existing features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants