We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
struct = deci.structs['/eh_frame_hdr'] struct.name = "my_struct_name" struct.members[0].name = 'new_name' struct.members[0].type = 'undefined' struct.members[1].name = 'new_name_2' struct.members[1].type = 'undefined' deci.structs['/eh_frame_hdr'] = struct assert deci.structs['/' + struct.name] == struct
If this test is run using the fauxware example binary, everything updates except for the struct names. https://github.com/binsync/libbs/blob/585d5fabdfc50826316472abeb6d9e05d1cc3f1a/libbs/decompilers/ghidra/interface.py#L395C17-L395C84 This is the problematic line. Instead of replacing the struct members with the names provided, it seems to replace them with generic names like field_0 and field_1.
field_0
field_1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
If this test is run using the fauxware example binary, everything updates except for the struct names.
https://github.com/binsync/libbs/blob/585d5fabdfc50826316472abeb6d9e05d1cc3f1a/libbs/decompilers/ghidra/interface.py#L395C17-L395C84
This is the problematic line. Instead of replacing the struct members with the names provided, it seems to replace them with generic names like
field_0
andfield_1
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: