You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am working on the Princeton Geniza Project, and I wanted to inquire about MS Heb. c 13. It seems part 2 refers to folio 2, and part 3 refers to folio 4. There are images for folio 3, however. Has folio 3 been skipped intentionally, or is this an error?
I don't have an answer, but I can add two further pieces of information:
If the problem is with the TEI record, then it dates back to the printed catalogue on which it is based, because the mapping of shelfmarks to folio numbers appears to be the same.
Hello,
I am working on the Princeton Geniza Project, and I wanted to inquire about MS Heb. c 13. It seems part 2 refers to folio 2, and part 3 refers to folio 4. There are images for folio 3, however. Has folio 3 been skipped intentionally, or is this an error?
https://genizah.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/catalog/volume_25#MS_Heb_c_13-part2
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: