You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi guys,
I am trying to compare GLOMAP performances with GTSfM. I can duplicate the results of GLOMAP (and COLMAP) runned on ETH3D undistorted scenes, while for GTSfM I am getting very bad results for 22 out of 25 scenes. For both I use SIFT as feature extractor. I am running the command in scripts/eth3d_benchmark.sh that is
where {scene_path} is, for example, .../Datasets/ETH3D_Stereo/DSLR_undistorted_gtsfm/door.
According to the code and the argument --colmap_files_dirpath I am passing the GT intrinsics to the model, but when I check the camera.txt file of ba_output folder I get a different camera model and other parameters (eventhough they are basically zero). Consider the scene "door", the following is the GT camera.txt file
As far as I get, the GT params are [fx, fy, cx,cy], while for GTSfM output I get (scaled) [fx, cx, cy, k1, k1]. Moreover, the camera model changes from pinhole to radial.
Considering I can reproduce the GLOMAP's paper results, I assume my evaluation code is correct. I have the following questions:
Am I missing something?
Is that the proper way to pass intrisics to the pipeline?
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi guys,
I am trying to compare GLOMAP performances with GTSfM. I can duplicate the results of GLOMAP (and COLMAP) runned on ETH3D undistorted scenes, while for GTSfM I am getting very bad results for 22 out of 25 scenes. For both I use SIFT as feature extractor. I am running the command in
scripts/eth3d_benchmark.sh
that iswhere {scene_path} is, for example,
.../Datasets/ETH3D_Stereo/DSLR_undistorted_gtsfm/door
.According to the code and the argument
--colmap_files_dirpath
I am passing the GT intrinsics to the model, but when I check the camera.txt file of ba_output folder I get a different camera model and other parameters (eventhough they are basically zero). Consider the scene "door", the following is the GT camera.txt file0 PINHOLE 6212 4140 3415.67 3414.36 3119.82 2054.28
while in GTSfM I get
0 RADIAL 1140 760 626.8293303284069 572.5361880231809 377.1142028985508 4.782895950634459e-09 -9.97228226196883e-09
As far as I get, the GT params are [fx, fy, cx,cy], while for GTSfM output I get (scaled) [fx, cx, cy, k1, k1]. Moreover, the camera model changes from pinhole to radial.
Considering I can reproduce the GLOMAP's paper results, I assume my evaluation code is correct. I have the following questions:
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: