You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current behavior is to have the names of the analysis variables in a column and use generic column names like "row_var" and "col_var". This is usually the behavior I want because it makes it easy to combine multiple results tables into a single table for presentation (e.g. Table 1). However, there are times (e.g., when passing results to ggplot) that it can be useful to have the analysis variable as the column name containing its categories.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mbcann01
changed the title
Add a group names option
Add an argument that will allow the user to choose to the names of the analysis varaibles in a column or in the column name
Aug 20, 2020
The current behavior is to have the names of the analysis variables in a column and use generic column names like "row_var" and "col_var". This is usually the behavior I want because it makes it easy to combine multiple results tables into a single table for presentation (e.g. Table 1). However, there are times (e.g., when passing results to ggplot) that it can be useful to have the analysis variable as the column name containing its categories.
Sun Study example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: