Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrapping up the GCC2016 Datathon #54

Open
cschu opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Wrapping up the GCC2016 Datathon #54

cschu opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@cschu
Copy link
Collaborator

cschu commented Jun 29, 2016

Hi fellow Datathoneers,

Thank you very much for taking part in the second GCC Datathon. We hope you had a good experience. In order to get an overview on current and potential future Datathon activities, we would love to hear from you what you did during the Datathon. Comments and criticism are also welcome. If you could briefly summarise things you did during the Datathon (or just link the github tickets you were working on if they are already summarised) and whether you are planning to continue working on it and post this as a reply to this ticket that would be great and help us a lot.

All the best,
@frederikcoppens , @jennaj , @cschu

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 29, 2016

We have working ChIP-seq and RNA-seq pipelines for mammalian system. The plan is to describe pros/cons of elements of these pipes and alternative solutions.

@msauria
Copy link
Collaborator

msauria commented Jun 29, 2016

Trackster exporter is functional.
#55

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:16 PM, test567 [email protected] wrote:

We have working ChIP-seq and RNA-seq pipelines for mammalian system. The
plan is to describe pros/cons of elements of these pipes and alternative
solutions.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#54 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AFMBjWLHITLV6-GEZ0trCGFWUtzIVknCks5qQppwgaJpZM4JBHKq
.

@MoHeydarian
Copy link

I think we should consider a drafting a manuscript (or some resource) where we highlight these RNA-seq and chIP-seq workflows with benefits and drawbacks of the various alternative options, as Krzys suggested. In doing so, we would introduce the Galaxy workflow environment where the alternative (tool) options can be implemented to the base workflows. It would be excellent if we could make an Interactive Tour to show this.

I can't emphasize enough that this would be targeting novice, end-users who are not familiar with NGS analysis.

Interested in feedback

@yvanlebras
Copy link
Collaborator

yvanlebras commented Jun 29, 2016

Hi everyone. +1 for the @MoHeydarian proposal!

My Datathon summary:
From #28:

From #29:

Waiting that Stacks related tools will be reinstall after enabling conda based Galaxy tools dependencies to be install on the cloud instance. If this can be made before the end og GCC, I will create workflows for RADseq data analysis using STACKS toolsuite.

Galaxy-tour:

@ssander5
Copy link
Collaborator

ssander5 commented Jul 5, 2016

Summary:
I found and compiled publicly available, annotated data sets from published work using published workflows to use as training sets. They are small, but contain many of the common data isssue for each type.

#30

@bgruening
Copy link
Collaborator

@ssander5 this is great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants