Deprecate PyPI/CADET

[hannahlanzrath]

Since CADET (https://pypi.org/project/CADET/) is currently an alias fo CADET-Python, the release needs to be done there separately with the cadet_pypi_release branch to push the correct README.

[schmoelder]

Please consider adding another CI Pipeline to automate this.

[schmoelder]

• Hijacking to remind ourselves that we also need to create a release on conda-forge.

[schmoelder]

Important Note: After talking to @lieres, we decided to stop publising code in PyPI/cadet. Instead, we should simply add are README containing: "Wer das installiert ist doof" (or similar) and refer to the proper package. This way, we don't "lose" the name in the package index s.t. we can later still use it for meta packages.

[lieres]

The readme should contain a short explanation (CADET is now used for the organization on GitHub and might be used for a meta package on PyPI) and links to the following pages for further information:

https://github.com/cadet/
https://cadet.github.io/

[schmoelder]

FYI, there is a broken link in the README.

[schmoelder]

Also, if I may nitpick, If I remember correctly, we had consider to raise an error on import which tells the users from where to get the "correct" packages.
Alternatively, it would be great to include this in the meta data s.t. it shows this when running pip show cadet

[hannahlanzrath]

I did what you and Eric stated here

Important Note: After talking to @lieres, we decided to stop publising code in PyPI/cadet. Instead, we should simply add are README containing: "Wer das installiert ist doof" (or similar) and refer to the proper package. This way, we don't "lose" the name in the package index s.t. we can later still use it for meta packages.

The readme should contain a short explanation (CADET is now used for the organization on GitHub and might be used for a meta package on PyPI) and links to the following pages for further information:
https://github.com/cadet/
https://cadet.github.io/

If you feel that is not enough, I can reopen the issue?

[lieres]

I hope you used a polite alternative for "doof" ;)

[hannahlanzrath]

Also, if I may nitpick, If I remember correctly, we had consider to raise an error on import which tells the users from where to get the "correct" packages. Alternatively, it would be great to include this in the meta data s.t. it shows this when running pip show cadet

Added error on import and changed link in meta data.