Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 4, 2018. It is now read-only.

Inter-Reg Cross Reference Linking #702

Open
ascott1 opened this issue Mar 27, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Inter-Reg Cross Reference Linking #702

ascott1 opened this issue Mar 27, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@ascott1
Copy link
Member

ascott1 commented Mar 27, 2015

CFPB's Regs J, K and L are intertwined contain cross references to one another. Tool currently does not have the functionality to link between regs. Example shows a reference in Reg J section 1010.4(c) to Reg K section 1011.15(f).

40051934-c75b-11e4-9a50-7d7710338d72

@cmc333333
Copy link
Contributor

@ascott1 I think the necessary functionality for this lives in the parser. There's an explicit pass it takes to remove any "internal" citations that don't have an entry in the tree. That'd need to be modified to take into account other regulations. Another interesting challenge: which version of the other reg should it link to?

@ascott1
Copy link
Member Author

ascott1 commented Nov 4, 2015

which version of the other reg should it link to?

@jehlers
Copy link
Contributor

jehlers commented Nov 6, 2015

Another question, is it an internal or "external" link?

@willbarton
Copy link
Member

which version of the other reg should it link to?

I have some thoughts that bear no relation to how simple/complex it would be to implement: I would imagine you'd want to link between versions with text that is co-effecitve.

So, J and K have only one version, effecitve 12/30/2011. L has two versions, a 12/30/2011 and 5/3/2012. So, if the section being cited didn't change in the 5/3/2012 version (which is later than 12/30/2011), we can link to it, otherwise link to 12/30/2011.

I'm thinking happy thoughts about this from the user side, because from the back-end, it seems like it'd be... complicated.

@cmc333333
Copy link
Contributor

That's a really interesting idea @willbarton ; I agree it'd be difficult to implement. Hypothetically, all of the data is present, though

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants