We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A big part of our cycle counts are due to sha512 hashes, which we only use in soft confirmation and sov-tx signatures.
These are coming from ed25519-dalek signatures.
With the new precompile for k256, we can start using ECDSA over secp256k1.
This should support old blocks as well, so make use of fork handling.
However let's start by benchmarking verification of both algorithms in zkvm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ercecan
No branches or pull requests
A big part of our cycle counts are due to sha512 hashes, which we only use in soft confirmation and sov-tx signatures.
These are coming from ed25519-dalek signatures.
With the new precompile for k256, we can start using ECDSA over secp256k1.
This should support old blocks as well, so make use of fork handling.
However let's start by benchmarking verification of both algorithms in zkvm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: