You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, I would like to thank you for your work with MolPal, I'm sure this will be very useful to the drug discovery community in the future.
I am trying to use your software to predict docking scores that have been generated by my own consensus docking pipeline .
I am struggling to understand (despite your very clear documentation) how I would go about this. If I understand correctly I would be using the lookup function of Molpal. However, when I look at your examples on GitHub (for example in /examples/objective/EnamineHTS_lookup.ini which points to /data/EnamineHTS_scores.csv.gz) it seems the software is looking at the entire libraries docking scores. Obviously, I am understanding something wrong here as the point is to have to dock only a small part of the library.
These are the two ways I understand this, feel free to let me know if I'm completely off with either of these...
Assuming I dock 1% of the library to start with, I would then essentially train the model on that 1%, do one iteration of Molpal, then dock the compounds predicted to have good docking scores. Then repeat this process until I reach a total of 6 iterations as described in the paper?
Alternatively, assuming I dock 1% of the library to start with, would I then run Molpal directly using this 1% as a lookup and not have to dock the suggested compounds (except if I wanted to check the performance of the prediction?). In this case, I don't fully grasp why there would be an option to 'retrain from scratch'.
I apologize if I am missing something obvious.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The --library setting is meant for retrospective evaluations and comparison of different settings and scoring functions.
In the README, we mention how to use the docking objective functions. An example of a configuration file is here.
If there is a different callable evaluation, you can use the DockingObjectiveclass as a reference. It might take some tweaking to get this right, but it should be doable!
First of all, I would like to thank you for your work with MolPal, I'm sure this will be very useful to the drug discovery community in the future.
I am trying to use your software to predict docking scores that have been generated by my own consensus docking pipeline .
I am struggling to understand (despite your very clear documentation) how I would go about this. If I understand correctly I would be using the lookup function of Molpal. However, when I look at your examples on GitHub (for example in /examples/objective/EnamineHTS_lookup.ini which points to /data/EnamineHTS_scores.csv.gz) it seems the software is looking at the entire libraries docking scores. Obviously, I am understanding something wrong here as the point is to have to dock only a small part of the library.
These are the two ways I understand this, feel free to let me know if I'm completely off with either of these...
I apologize if I am missing something obvious.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: