-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't skip training test #751
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The training test is very slow since yesterday. I am skipping it for now, see:
https://github.com/computational-cell-analytics/micro-sam/blob/master/test/test_training.py#L13-L14
But we should figure out why it's slower and reactivate it so that we notice if some change affects training.
I am not sure what the reason is for this slowdown. Nothing has changed in the training code, it seems to happen irrespective of the pytorch version, so is also not just for pytorch 2.5, and everything still works normally for me locally.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: