You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
currently it uses the default groupby <- "Sample" looks quite busy when we have a lot of samples.
Can we add groupby=gby_rf to the function call to use the reactive value from the user as we do for the recurrent plots? This would be useful when the user has subgroup columns like we had "broad_histology" to plot fusion summary and recurrent fusion/gene per subgroup which might look cleaner.
Who will complete the feature request (please add a GitHub handle here if relevant)?
Purpose/implementation Section
Briefly descibe the feature
I was wondering if we should allow users to provide the grouping column for plot_summary() call here:
annoFuse/R/shinyFuse.R
Line 799 in 92cdd69
groupby <- "Sample"
looks quite busy when we have a lot of samples.Can we add
groupby=gby_rf
to the function call to use the reactive value from the user as we do for the recurrent plots? This would be useful when the user has subgroup columns like we had "broad_histology" to plot fusion summary and recurrent fusion/gene per subgroup which might look cleaner.Who will complete the feature request (please add a GitHub handle here if relevant)?
@federicomarini
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: