Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Elaborate to other domains #10

Open
amitness opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Elaborate to other domains #10

amitness opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@amitness
Copy link
Contributor

amitness commented Mar 5, 2020

@omarsar Thanks for starting this initiative.

I was wondering if we can expand this from nlp_paper_summaries to paper_summaries instead and group papers by the domain: "NLP", "Computer Vision" etc. There is no existing platform that curates such paper summaries in one place and so paper_summaries could fill that gap. Just a thought.

@omarsar
Copy link
Member

omarsar commented Mar 5, 2020

@amitness We are considering this, any suggestions on how we can better structure the repo if we were to go with paper_summaries? My initial thought was to create folders and include a README in each one? So we would have separate folders for compuater_vision, nlp, etc for now? I was even considering having separate repos but could take a bit more effort to maintain, I like the concept of just having one repo.

In addition, we would need some help (domain expertise) to maintain the different domains, create the proper groupings, etc.

@amitness
Copy link
Contributor Author

amitness commented Mar 5, 2020

@omarsar Separate folders with dedicated README.md in each sounds like a good idea. We could also link them from the main README.md.

@vrdn-23
Copy link
Collaborator

vrdn-23 commented Mar 5, 2020

I agree with @omarsar on this! One repo sounds ideal but the main obstacle would be having the required domain expertise in order to find, accumulate and segregate papers from various domains

@omarsar
Copy link
Member

omarsar commented Dec 4, 2021

Note to self: Look into this issue a bit closer and come up with general structure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants