Improve the specification of ICRC standards development process

[iclighthouse]

It is recommended to improve the development process of ICRC series standards, please refer to the standard development process of EIP and the degree of standardization of outputs.
Especially after the standard is officially released, the revision should be strictly forward compatible.

The other suggestion is that the standards need to be developed by first adhering to some basic principles of the profession, and then by preparing different holistic solutions led by different core personnel, and then by extensively validating and voting on these holistic solutions.
Voting applies to the choice between multiple overall options, not to every detail. If decisions on each detail depend on voting, the entire standard will be less engineered and less professional, even as conflicts and modifications arise between different details. I call on Foundation professionals to be more involved in the preparation of candidates for the standard, rather than placing everything on working group discussions and votes. I hope that people with extensive architecture and design experience will take the lead on these things and improve the quality of the ICRC standard.