Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[JIT] enable polymorphic inlining and devirtualization #917

Open
weixlu opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

[JIT] enable polymorphic inlining and devirtualization #917

weixlu opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@weixlu
Copy link
Collaborator

weixlu commented Jan 2, 2025

No description provided.

weixlu added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2025
@weixlu
[JIT] enable polymorphic inlining and devirtualization
bb1cf46 
Summary: inline and devirtualize more receivers in polymorphic conditions

Testing: jtreg and ci

Reviewers: maoliang, Kuaiwei

Issue: #917
@weixlu weixlu mentioned this issue Jan 2, 2025
Merged
weixlu added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2025
@weixlu
[JIT] enable polymorphic inlining and devirtualization
bc0e926 
Summary: inline and devirtualize more receivers in polymorphic conditions

Testing: jtreg and ci

Reviewers: maoliang, Kuaiwei

Issue: #917
weixlu added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2025
@weixlu
[JIT] enable polymorphic inlining and devirtualization
5134d44 
Summary: inline and devirtualize more receivers in polymorphic conditions

Testing: jtreg and ci

Reviewers: maoliang, Kuaiwei

Issue: #917
weixlu added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2025
@weixlu
[JIT] enable polymorphic inlining and devirtualization
6fb7ecd 
Summary: inline and devirtualize more receivers in polymorphic conditions

Testing: jtreg and ci

Reviewers: maoliang, Kuaiwei

Issue: #917
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@weixlu