You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
feature request
Currently, conducting a heat calculation, a hydraulic calculation is done beforehand. This calculation is done independently from the heat calculation. This can cause unexpected behaviour.
possible solutions
A solution is to couple the heat and hydraulic calcuation. Setting a flag would enable to choose between different options. I see three options:
) Seperated: Keep it like this. heat and hydraulic calcuations are seperated.
) Iterative: The results of the heat calculation are passed back to the hydraulic calculation and the entire calculation is repeated.
) Integrative: heat and hydraulic calculation are done combined.
alternatives
Keep it like this, however, adapt the documentation, so that a user understand the corresponding behaviour.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
feature request
Currently, conducting a heat calculation, a hydraulic calculation is done beforehand. This calculation is done independently from the heat calculation. This can cause unexpected behaviour.
possible solutions
A solution is to couple the heat and hydraulic calcuation. Setting a flag would enable to choose between different options. I see three options:
alternatives
Keep it like this, however, adapt the documentation, so that a user understand the corresponding behaviour.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: