Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generated code uses deprecated Json4JProvidersRegistry #272

Closed
danlz opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

Generated code uses deprecated Json4JProvidersRegistry #272

danlz opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@danlz
Copy link

danlz commented Aug 30, 2023

The generated Application class uses the deprecated Json4JProvidersRegistry class.

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

Unfortunately, some tools like IBM Jazz still actively rely on this non-standard format that we marked as unsupported. For user convenience, we are still generating the code to enable support for that format. However, the project will only be supporting W3C JSON-LD over non-standard "OSLC JSON". If you find a high-impact bug in the non-standard "OSLC JSON" providers, we might still merge the fix for that considering what I described above, but no new feature development is planned.

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

Please reopen if this doesn't resolve the issue for you.

@jadelkhoury
Copy link
Contributor

@berezovskyi ! Given that, how about no longer marking Json4JProvidersRegistry as deprecated?
Is it just the registry that is deprecated, or the whole json-provider library?

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

@jadelkhoury I think you can get away with RDF/XML with Jazz. I would be happy to remove OSLC JSON support once we confirm that, actually.

@danlz
Copy link
Author

danlz commented Dec 12, 2023

Maybe this can be controlled through some parameter?

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

Ideally, yes

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

Update: OSLC doesn't require OSLC JSON but some domain specs like OSLC RM do: eclipse-lyo/lyo.testsuite#29 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants