You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes that's right, the 5529 is featuring a more robust pin mapping so that its easier to interact with multiple BoosterPacks. This is following that standards that are posted on ti.com. It's better to use these updated pin assignments for future proofing.
Re Wire1/SPI0-2: Is this referring to static, pre-initialized instances of the respective classes? If so, I'd be concerned about wasted memory when not in use. Defining the module as parameter of the constructor would make more sense.
I don't know if this is the best place to note this, but in a couple of the libraries I've had to edit the
#if defined(…)
statement to add the F5529 to the list of supported parts.
The ones I'm using are for the BMP085 barometry sensor and the DHT22 humidity sensor.
According to its quickstart guide, some of the pin assignments on the Booster Pack connectors are different from other MSP430s (e.g., the I2C).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: